[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1317675520.3375.82.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 21:58:40 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@...uge.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Signal scalability series
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 18:35 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 10/03, Matt Fleming wrote:
> >
> > Oh, are you referring to Oleg's email about the slow down under kvm?
> > Yeah, admittedly that's a pretty clear indicator that something is wrong
> > with the approach in this patch series.
>
> Or there was something wrong with my testing, please recheck. I specially
> mentioned I was surprised by the numbers. May be kvm, or lockdep...
No, I don't think there was anything wrong with your testing method. I
ran your command-line under Qemu and saw similar results - with the
patches applied the single-threaded case slows down (not by 50%, it
looks more like 25%, but that's still unacceptable and not at all what I
had anticipated).
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists