[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1110032312260.31654@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 23:14:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: "Lu, Hongjiu" <hongjiu.lu@...el.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm00@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization
disabled (was Re: [RFC PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization
disabled)
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Lu, Hongjiu wrote:
> Why not
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM)
> #define CHECK_PF_RANDOMIZE 1
> #else
> #define CHECK_PF_RANDOMIZE 0
> #endif
> if (CHECK_PF_RANDOMIZE && (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE))
> load_bias = 0;
> else
> load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE - vaddr);
If anything, that is not particularly good name for that macro (as we are
checking current->flags for PF_RANDOMIZE at other places indepenedntly on
this).
Personally, I find my original patch the most readable one, but I don't
care much, it's really bike-shedding.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists