[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1110040051440.31654@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 00:56:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm00@...il.com>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, hongjiu.lu@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization
disabled (was Re: [RFC PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization
disabled)
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > Guys, it took several people several days and 10+ emails to work out
> > what's happening in there, and the first attempt to fix it was buggy.
> > This is all a huuuuge signal that the code is unobvious, hard to
> > understand, hard to maintain.
>
> It's unfortunately true. Rewriting the ELF binary loader is on my list of
> very-long-term TODOs. It has became quite a monster over decades.
>
> > Please, let's get a good code comment in there while it's fresh in your
> > minds. So the next person who comes along doesn't have the same amount
> > of difficulty?
Andrew,
find the updated patch below. Please consider applying.
I believe Cc to stable is appropriate as well.
Thanks a lot Josh for verification of the fix.
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: fix PIE execution with randomization disabled
The case of address space randomization being disabled in runtime through
randomize_va_space sysctl is not treated properly in load_elf_binary(),
resulting in SIGKILL coming at exec() time for certain PIE-linked binaries
in case the randomization has been disabled at runtime prior to calling
exec().
Handle the randomize_va_space == 0 case the same way as if we were not
supporting .text randomization at all.
Based on original patch by H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@...el.com> and.
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Tested-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
---
fs/binfmt_elf.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
index dd0fdfc..21ac5ee 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
@@ -795,7 +795,16 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct pt_regs *regs)
* might try to exec. This is because the brk will
* follow the loader, and is not movable. */
#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM)
- load_bias = 0;
+ /* Memory randomization might have been switched off
+ * in runtime via sysctl.
+ * If that is the case, retain the original non-zero
+ * load_bias value in order to establish proper
+ * non-randomized mappings.
+ */
+ if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE)
+ load_bias = 0;
+ else
+ load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE - vaddr);
#else
load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE - vaddr);
#endif
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists