linux-kernel - Re: [patch v2 1/2] sched: Use resched IPI to kick off the nohz idle balance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1317719121.25926.15.camel@twins>
Date:	Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:05:21 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Venki Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2 1/2] sched: Use resched IPI to kick off the nohz idle
 balance

On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 15:09 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> +               smp_mb();
> +               /*
> +                * Use smp_send_reschedule() instead of resched_cpu().
> +                * This way we generate a sched IPI on the target cpu which
> +                * is idle. And the softirq performing nohz idle load balance
> +                * will be run before returning from the IPI.
> +                */
> +               smp_send_reschedule(ilb_cpu); 

Now the only thing missing is where the matching barrier is, does
receiving an interrupt imply a mb? If so that wants mentioning
somewhere, otherwise people will wonder how we can ever read the right
value.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/