linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22/30] mfd: build twl6030 only on omap2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201110041647.02690.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:47:02 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
	Balaji T K <balajitk@...com>, Hemanth V <hemanthv@...com>,
	Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/30] mfd: build twl6030 only on omap2

On Tuesday 04 October 2011, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 04:45:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > We can only have one pwm driver built into the kernel,
> I seem to remember that Bill Gatliff was working on a PWM subsystem that would
> get rid of the current pwm.h ugliness. Do we have any updates on this one ?

I don't know if the work on the pwm subsystem is progressing right now,
there were at one point two competing patches, but so far neither of them
has made it into linux-next.
 
> The patch below looks like a hack to me, trying to work around the current
> lack of such subsystem.

Absolutely. I'll clarify this in the patch description when I fix the
bug pointed out by Balaji T Krishnamoorthy.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/