[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyV9uqTt6UHA2wsAdRHHCSAtCSmoO2d3dm62HAo+s75Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:51:10 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Jon Mason <mason@...i.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pci: Clamp pcie_set_readrq() when using "performance" settings
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
>>
>> Well, bcrl argues that patches 1-2 of 3 are actively wrong.
>
> This is an argument that isn't finished :-)
Oh, I absolutely *hope* it isn't finished, but there's no way I'm
applying a patch for -rc9 that people are still actively arguing
whether it's at all valid or not.
Which is why I'm planning on applying 3/3 just to make the whole issue
irrelevant for 3.1, and then the people who want to test things out
can apply whatever patches they want and play with the kernel command
line options to actually enable whatever behavior they are testing.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists