[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E8B7D3D.9000204@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 23:40:13 +0200
From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
CC: "Hilman, Kevin" <khilman@...com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Joerg Roedel <Joerg.Roedel@....com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/5] ARM: OMAP: omap_device: add a method to set iommu private
archdata
On 10/4/2011 9:54 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Kevin Hilman<khilman@...com> wrote:
>> The approach is OK with me, but I'm a bit torn about whether or not to
>> merge this since the need for this should go away when converting to DT.
>
> I guess it will still take some time until our boards are fully
> functional with DT, so I think we should regard this as an interim
> solution. Without this patch, a huge deal of code consolidation and
> generalization is gated (namely - generic iommu and dma api, and
> everything that depends on it, e.g. rpmsg/remoteproc).
>
>> Is anyone working on IOMMU DT description?
>
> Unless Benoit is, I'll happily pick this up.
Cool, a volunteer... You're in.
Thanks,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists