[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111005092350.GA7485@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:53:50 +0530
From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, crash-utility@...hat.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, anderson@...hat.com,
tachibana@....nes.nec.co.jp, oomichi@....nes.nec.co.jp
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/4][kernel][slimdump] Add new elf-note of type
NT_NOCOREDUMP to capture slimdump
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 09:33:13AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 12:48:44PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 10:04:37AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 01:02:03PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> > > > There are certain types of crashes induced by faulty hardware in which
> > > > capturing crashing kernel's memory (through kdump) makes no sense (or sometimes
> > > > dangerous).
> > > >
> > > > A case in point, is unrecoverable memory errors (resulting in fatal machine
> > > > check exceptions) in which reading from the faulty memory location from the
> > > > kexec'ed kernel will cause double fault and system reset (leaving no
> > > > information for the user).
> > >
> > > Prasad,
> > >
> > > I am just trying to remember what was wrong with Andi's approach of
> > > disable MCE while copying the dump?
> > >
> >
> > Hi Vivek,
> > The behaviour upon a read operation on an UC memory location is
> > undefined and so we want to avoid it (previously discussed here:
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1146799). When we disable
> > MCE and copy the dump, we will invariably read the faulty memory
> > location.
>
> Right, from the message above:
>
> "- To disable MCE exceptions as done by the patches cited above. However
> the result of a read operation on corrupted memory is unknown and the
> system behaviour is undefined. We're unsure if this is a safe thing to
> do."
>
> Can you elaborate more on that? Are we talking poisoned memory here or
> undetected and uncorrectable memory errors?
>
It refers to uncorrected memory errors that are not consumed and the
corresponding 'struct page's are marked PG_hwpoison. Typically the SRAO
type errors that are handled in mm/memory-failure.c.
If MCE is enabled, during a kdump, we will deliberately trigger a read
operation over the poisoned memory and make the UCE fatal. It is not
clear what would happen if MCE is disabled in the above case.
Thanks,
K.Prasad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists