[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111005014242.GA10237@localhost>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:42:42 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] IO-less dirty throttling v12
> As far as I can tell from the current test results,
> the writeback performance mostly stays on par with vanilla 3.1 kernel
> except for -14% regression on average for NFS, which can be cut down
> to -7% by limiting the commit size.
I find that the overall NFS throughput can be improved by 42% when
doing the NFS writeback wait queue and limiting the commit size.
3.1.0-rc8-ioless6+ 3.1.0-rc8-nfs-wq-smooth+
------------------------ ------------------------
22.43 +79.2% 40.20 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
28.21 +11.9% 31.58 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
29.21 +54.0% 44.98 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
14.12 +31.0% 18.50 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
29.44 +2.1% 30.06 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
9.09 +231.0% 30.07 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
25.68 +88.6% 48.43 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
41.06 +14.9% 47.16 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
39.13 +26.7% 49.56 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
238.38 +42.9% 340.54 TOTAL
The theoretic explanation could be, one smooths out the NFS write
requests and the other smooths out the NFS commits, hence yielding
better utilized network/disk pipeline.
As a result, the -14% regression can be turned around into 23% speedup
comparing to vanilla kernel:
3.1.0-rc4-vanilla+ 3.1.0-rc8-nfs-wq-smooth+
------------------------ ------------------------
20.89 +92.5% 40.20 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
39.43 -19.9% 31.58 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
26.60 +69.1% 44.98 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
12.70 +45.7% 18.50 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
27.41 +9.7% 30.06 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
26.52 +13.4% 30.07 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
40.70 +19.0% 48.43 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
45.28 +4.2% 47.16 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
35.74 +38.7% 49.56 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
275.28 +23.7% 340.54 TOTAL
The tests don't cover disk arrays on the server side, however it does
test various combinations of memory:bandwidth ratio.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists