linux-kernel - Re: [Patch 1/4][kernel][slimdump] Add new elf-note of type NT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <26571.1317815746@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Wed, 05 Oct 2011 07:55:46 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	"K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, crash-utility@...hat.com,
	kexec@...ts.infradead.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, anderson@...hat.com,
	tachibana@....nes.nec.co.jp, oomichi@....nes.nec.co.jp
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/4][kernel][slimdump] Add new elf-note of type NT_NOCOREDUMP to capture slimdump

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 09:31:11 +0200, Borislav Petkov said:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 12:37:28PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:

> > True. Like stated by me earlier, there could be two possible outcomes
> > from capturing memory dump in such cases - they're either dangerous or
> > doesn't make sense.
>
> Why, in the second example the only corruption is to the L2 cache so
> your memory image is intact. Why wouldn't you want to capture a memory
> dump then? It is business as usual in that case.

I'll bite.  What's the use case for bothering to capture a memory dump when
you're looking at an MCE that indicates L2 cache corruption?  What additional
useful information could you possibly get from the dump?


Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped