linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/10] provide a version of cpuusage statistics inside cpu cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E8C7246.3060700@parallels.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Oct 2011 19:05:42 +0400
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <paul@...lmenage.org>,
	<lizf@...fujitsu.com>, <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>,
	<jbottomley@...allels.com>, Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] provide a version of cpuusage statistics inside
 cpu cgroup

On 10/05/2011 04:31 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 16:22 +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>
>> We should at least sum up se and rt_se, right?
>
> Ah yes indeed.

sched_rt.c:

         curr->se.sum_exec_runtime += delta_exec;

Where did I get this crazy idea about rt_se from? I swear I did not do 
any drugs today...

>> Otherwise... I will re-read the code, but from a first sight, I think
>> you are right.
>
> Good, less hierarchy walks ->  *win*

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/