[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACxGe6si_i9mbVQFjbKYkq1H1QOp9UvQqrd=+2fYGrs63xzC1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:43:02 -0600
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] drivercore: Add helper macro for platform_driver boilerplate
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 05:26:55PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> For simple modules that contain a single platform_driver without any
>> additional setup code then ends up being a block of duplicated
>> boilerplate. This patch adds a new macro, module_platform_driver(),
>> which replaces the module_init()/module_exit() registrations with
>> template functions.
>>
>> This patch also converts all the relevant spi drivers to use the new
>> macro. There are a lot of drivers in the tree that are using this
>> pattern and could be converted.
>>
>> It also fixes up some incorrect section annotations where I found
>> them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
>> ---
>>
>> I think this is useful, and I like the diffstat that it produces.
>> What does everyone else think of this approach? I can do versions for
>> i2c_drivers and spi_drivers too.
>>
>> This is *not* tested very much. I'm circulating mostly for review for
>> now.
>
> The idea looks sane to me, I like the diffstat it ends up creating, nice
> job.
Thanks. Can I take that as your a-b? Can I merge it via the spi tree?
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists