[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACxGe6tJJiX55r9z_Pvn4DMsPRyBK0qfeedNikBjVN3JHSo=+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:58:40 -0600
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: langwell: ensure alternate function is cleared
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
> On 04/10/11 21:37, Grant Likely wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 02:36:07PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> + ptr = (void __iomem *)(lnw->reg_base + reg_type * nreg * 4 + reg
>>> * 4);
>>
>> This looks wrong. It looks to me like the __iomem annotation should
>> be added to ->reg_base.
>>
>> Otherwise, the patch looks okay.
>>
>
> Deserves a separate patch...
What order do they get applied in? </grant-being-lazy>
>
> From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:29:27 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] gpio: langwell: declare reg_base as __iomem
>
> reg_base is __iomem so add that to the declaration
> and fix up assignment casts and types.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
> index 00692e8..b7465e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ enum GPIO_REG {
>
> struct lnw_gpio {
> struct gpio_chip chip;
> - void *reg_base;
> + void __iomem *reg_base;
> spinlock_t lock;
> unsigned irq_base;
> struct pci_dev *pdev;
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static void __iomem *gpio_reg(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> unsigned offset,
> u8 reg = offset / 32;
> void __iomem *ptr;
>
> - ptr = (void __iomem *)(lnw->reg_base + reg_type * nreg * 4 + reg *
> 4);
> + ptr = lnw->reg_base + reg_type * nreg * 4 + reg * 4;
> return ptr;
> }
>
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static void __iomem *gpio_reg_2bit(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> unsigned offset,
> u8 reg = offset / 16;
> void __iomem *ptr;
>
> - ptr = (void __iomem *)(lnw->reg_base + reg_type * nreg * 4 + reg *
> 4);
> + ptr = lnw->reg_base + reg_type * nreg * 4 + reg * 4;
> return ptr;
> }
>
> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops lnw_gpio_pm_ops = {
> static int __devinit lnw_gpio_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> const struct pci_device_id *id)
> {
> - void *base;
> + void __iomem *base;
> int i;
> resource_size_t start, len;
> struct lnw_gpio *lnw;
> @@ -324,8 +324,8 @@ static int __devinit lnw_gpio_probe(struct pci_dev
> *pdev,
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error mapping bar1\n");
> goto err3;
> }
> - irq_base = *(u32 *)base;
> - gpio_base = *((u32 *)base + 1);
> + irq_base = *(__force u32 *)base;
> + gpio_base = *((__force u32 *)base + 1);
> /* release the IO mapping, since we already get the info from bar1 */
> iounmap(base);
> /* get the register base from bar0 */
> --
> 1.7.6
>
>
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists