[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ADE657CA350FB648AAC2C43247A983F001F39DCFE896@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:27:06 -0500
From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"adilger.kernel@...ger.ca" <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ext3/xattr_seciruty.c: local functions should be static
On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 4:38 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 23-09-11 15:07:09, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> Quiets the sparse noise:
>>
>> warning: symbol 'ext3_initxattrs' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>
>> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
> Here applies the same comment as to the ext2 patch - not in current
> Linus' kernel AFAICS.
These are in linux-next due to:
commit 9d8f13ba3f4833219e50767b022b82cd0da930eb
Author: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon Jun 6 15:29:25 2011 -0400
security: new security_inode_init_security API adds function callback
I can repost these after this commit hits Linus' kernel if necessary.
Thanks,
Hartley--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists