[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E8CA3EA.3080706@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 00:07:30 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Asit K Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] kernel/power/main.c: Not suspend/resume if CPU0 is
offlined
Hi,
On 10/05/2011 10:09 PM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
>
> @@ -178,6 +179,14 @@ static ssize_t state_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> int len;
> int error = -EINVAL;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> + if (bsp_hotpluggable && cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask) != 0) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Because CPU0 is offlined, system can't suspend/resume.\n");
> +
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +#endif
There is a possible race condition here. What if CPU0 gets offlined
AFTER this point(due to a CPU hotplug operation)?
We will probably have to prevent CPU0 from being taken offline from
this point onwards, and remove that restriction later on.
> +
> p = memchr(buf, '\n', n);
> len = p ? p - buf : n;
>
--
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Linux Technology Center,
IBM India Systems and Technology Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists