[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E8D6DDE.9050102@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:59:10 +0200
From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@...adcom.com>
To: "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
cc: "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eliad Peller" <eliad@...ery.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net
tree
On 10/06/2011 06:58 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in
> drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c between commit
> 37a41b4affa3 ("mac80211: add ieee80211_vif param to tsf functions") from
> the net tree and commit 3956b4a2ddb0 ("staging: brcm80211: remove locking
> macro definitions") from the staging tree.
>
> I fixed it up (which essentially means I used the staging tree version
> with one small change to the brcms_ops_conf_tx prototype) and can carry
> the fixes as necessary.
Thanks, Stephen
I had to make the mac80211 conf_tx callback change for the mainline
patch as well.
Acked.
Gr. AvS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists