[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUjsa5CtpiqgMgHpt7av+v5NZFFOtuKC0a10Hwgwtm0Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:10:05 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Ajaykumar Hotchandani <ajaykumar.hotchandani@...cle.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Set device power state to PCI_D0 for device without
native PM support
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> Hi,
>> drivers/pci/pci.c | 3 +++
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index e9651f0..ca8c82d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -664,6 +664,9 @@ static int pci_platform_power_transition(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state)
>> error = platform_pci_set_power_state(dev, state);
>> if (!error)
>> pci_update_current_state(dev, state);
>> + /* Fall back to PCI_D0 if native PM is not supported */
>> + else if (!dev->pm_cap)
>> + dev->current_state = PCI_D0;
>> } else {
>> error = -ENODEV;
>> /* Fall back to PCI_D0 if native PM is not supported */
>>
>
> I have some vague memories that we tried that and it broke something.
Do have any hint for us to dig out the configuration for failing?
>
> How thoroughly has it been tested?
tested in setups with intel cpus from Nehalem.
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists