linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/12] perf_events: add LBR software filter support for Intel X86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1317919424.29658.13.camel@twins>
Date:	Thu, 06 Oct 2011 18:43:44 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, acme@...hat.com,
	ming.m.lin@...el.com, robert.richter@....com, ravitillo@....gov,
	"masami.hiramatsu.pt" <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] perf_events: add LBR software filter support for
 Intel X86

On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 17:32 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > +	kernel_insn_init(&insn, kaddr);
> > +	insn_get_opcode(&insn);
> 
> This makes me uncomfortable. AFAIK that's the first use of the opcode
> decoder being used directly for user space. It has a quite large attack
> surface. Who says it cannot be exploited?

You mean:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c:intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip()
doesn't use the opcode decoder on user space code?

ISTR Masami telling me they ran fuzzers on it, feeding it bad
instructions etc. But maybe he can tell more.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/