linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-soc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111006111317.531e6fcc1829fc9927d4924d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:13:17 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-soc tree

Hi Arnd,

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:40:12 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 04 October 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > After merging the arm-soc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > ERROR: "clk_enable" [drivers/misc/atmel_pwm.ko] undefined!
> > ERROR: "clk_disable" [drivers/misc/atmel_pwm.ko] undefined!
> > ERROR: "clk_put" [drivers/misc/atmel_pwm.ko] undefined!
> > ERROR: "clk_get_rate" [drivers/misc/atmel_pwm.ko] undefined!
> > ERROR: "clk_get" [drivers/misc/atmel_pwm.ko] undefined!
> > 
> > Caused by commit 9dccc010c816 ("ARM: at91: remove dependency for Atmel
> > PWM driver selector in Kconfig").
> > 
> > I have used the arm-soc tree from next-20110930 for today.
> 
> Ah, thanks for tracking this down. I actually noticed the same
> problem on an ARM build but did not realize it was from one of
> the patches I had jut put in there myself.
> 
> I'm really glad I didn't send this to Linus cc:stable yet then.
> Nicolas, in my randconfig branch, I've fixed this by adding
> 
> 	depends on HAVE_CLK
> 
> which I think is the right solution. I'll replace your patch
> with one that does this if you don't mind.
> 
> I'd also remove the stable tag for this patch, because it can
> have unintended side-effects on other architectures.

I am still getting the failure ...
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped