[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E8D4B5A.6040106@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:31:54 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@...are.com>
CC: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linus walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
james p freyensee <james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com>,
sebras@...il.com, Ulf Hansson <Ulf.Hansson@...ricsson.com>,
stefan xk nilsson <stefan.xk.nilsson@...ricsson.com>,
per forlin <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>,
johan rudholm <johan.rudholm@...ricsson.com>, cjb@...top.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11] mmc : general purpose partition support.
On 05/10/11 18:33, Andrei Warkentin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Namjae Jeon"<linkinjeon@...il.com>
>> To: cjb@...top.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, awarkentin@...are.com, "adrian hunter"<adrian.hunter@...el.com>, "linus walleij"
>> <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, "james p freyensee"<james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com>, sebras@...il.com, "Ulf Hansson"
>> <Ulf.Hansson@...ricsson.com>, "stefan xk nilsson"<stefan.xk.nilsson@...ricsson.com>, "per forlin"
>> <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>, "johan rudholm"<johan.rudholm@...ricsson.com>, "Namjae Jeon"<linkinjeon@...il.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 10:45:45 AM
>> Subject: [PATCH v11] mmc : general purpose partition support.
>>
>> It allows gerneral purpose partitions in MMC Device.
>> And I try to simpliy make mmc_blk_alloc_parts using mmc_part
>> structure suggested by Andrei Warkentin.
>> After patching, we can see general purpose partitions like this.
>>> cat /proc/partitions
>> 179 0 847872 mmcblk0
>> 179 192 4096 mmcblk0gp3
>> 179 160 4096 mmcblk0gp2
>> 179 128 4096 mmcblk0gp1
>> 179 96 1052672 mmcblk0gp0
>> 179 64 1024 mmcblk0boot1
>> 179 32 1024 mmcblk0boot0
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon<linkinjeon@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 52
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> include/linux/mmc/card.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> include/linux/mmc/mmc.h | 5 +++-
>> 4 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
>> + for (idx = 0; idx< card->nr_parts; idx++) {
>> + if (mmc_is_boot_partition(&card->part[idx])&&
>> + !mmc_boot_partition_access(card->host))
>> + continue;
>> + if (card->part[idx].size) {
>> + ret = mmc_blk_alloc_part(card, md,
>> + card->part[idx].part_cfg,
>> + card->part[idx].size>> 9,
>> + card->part[idx].force_ro,
>> + card->part[idx].name);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> }
>
> Is there any reason for putting the mmc_boot_partition_access() logic here? If
> boot partitions are not allowed by host, then just don't add the mmc_parts to
> the parts array, no? Such minutae should belong in core mmc code, not block driver, IMHO.
I like data structures to model reality i.e. the partitions exist but are not
accessible. However I am not fussed - change it or not.
>
> A
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists