[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111007092243.GC27281@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 10:22:43 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal
<vjaquez@...lia.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Timo Teras <timo.teras@...idboot.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] omap: dmtimer: convert printk to pr_err
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:50:16AM +0200, Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal wrote:
> Convert a printk(KERN_ERR) message in the driver to pr_err().
...
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static void omap_dm_timer_wait_for_reset(struct omap_dm_timer *timer)
> while (!(__raw_readl(timer->sys_stat) & 1)) {
> c++;
> if (c > 100000) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "Timer failed to reset\n");
> + pr_err("Timer failed to reset\n");
What is the reason behind this change? It looks like it's to use the
latest and greatest function.
If so, please don't make these changes - we have on many occasions been
blamed for size of diffstat, churn, needless change, and this patch is
exactly that.
By all means fix printk's without KERN_ constants, possibly converting
them to pr_*, but don't go around replacing printk(KERN_* with pr_*(
without ensuring that there's a real benefit to the change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists