[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1317986519.31132.13.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:21:59 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, acme@...hat.com, ming.m.lin@...el.com,
robert.richter@....com, ravitillo@....gov,
"masami.hiramatsu.pt" <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] perf_events: add LBR software filter support for
Intel X86
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 13:18 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Yeah, depending on the depth of the LBR. But then what happens, you
> > decode an instruction that is not what was executed.
>
> Right, and Andi's concern is that this might cause our instruction
> decoder to blow up, or worse.
That is, we have a fair confidence that its capable of correctly
decoding correct streams, but I understood from Masami that they haven't
actually tried feeding it crap.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists