[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1318016901.11045.9.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 12:48:21 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Víctor Manuel Jáquez
Leal <vjaquez@...lia.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Timo Teras <timo.teras@...idboot.com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] omap: dmtimer: convert printk to pr_err
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 20:18 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:40:39AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > At some point in the next couple of years, I want
> > to convert all of, or as many as possible of, the
> > remaining printk uses to pr_<level>.
> If the idea is also to get rid of printk() too (which IMHO would be a
> good thing as it kills off the constant need to continually patch for
> missing KERN_ prefixes) then that's a good reason (provided Linus
> accepts the idea.)
I don't accept that idea yet.
There are about 50K printks vs 20K pr_<level>s
in kernel source.
I think 50K lines is _way_ too many to convert
in a couple of years.
I think it needs to be done subsystem by subsystem,
arch by arch, as maintainers accept.
And there's no hurry.
I have a script that automates most all of the
conversions, argument alignments, etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists