linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/26] ARM: pxa: add missing header inclusions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111008080309.GD25689@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 8 Oct 2011 09:03:09 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jason Chagas <jason.chagas@...vell.com>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/26] ARM: pxa: add missing header inclusions

On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 01:08:23PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > These resulted in build breakage in some configurations:
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c:132:39: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'icip_handle_irq'
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c |    1 +
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
> > index b09e848..848e96d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >  #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
> > +#include <linux/ftrace.h>
> 
> It's actually __irq_entry being defined in <linux/ftrace.h> and in turn
> __exception_irq_entry being conditionally defined to that.
> 
> I think it's better to fix this in <asm/system.h> instead of in the
> cases where this macro is referenced?
> 
> Russell?

There's a patch in the patch system which fixes this (7115/3) but I
can't apply it because it doesn't apply to anything in my for-next
tree (it applies to the obsolete 'devel' branch which is rather old
now.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/