[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111009080255.GC23003@barrios-desktop>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 17:02:55 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
aarcange@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: vmscan: Limit direct reclaim for higher order
allocations
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 04:17:22PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
>
> When suffering from memory fragmentation due to unfreeable pages,
> THP page faults will repeatedly try to compact memory. Due to the
> unfreeable pages, compaction fails.
>
> Needless to say, at that point page reclaim also fails to create
> free contiguous 2MB areas. However, that doesn't stop the current
> code from trying, over and over again, and freeing a minimum of 4MB
> (2UL << sc->order pages) at every single invocation.
>
> This resulted in my 12GB system having 2-3GB free memory, a
> corresponding amount of used swap and very sluggish response times.
>
> This can be avoided by having the direct reclaim code not reclaim from
> zones that already have plenty of free memory available for compaction.
>
> If compaction still fails due to unmovable memory, doing additional
> reclaim will only hurt the system, not help.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
--
Kinds regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists