linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the moduleh tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m2pqi6m4co.fsf@bob.laptop.org>
Date:	Sun, 09 Oct 2011 14:01:27 -0400
From:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
To:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc:	<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Per Forlin <per.forlin@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the moduleh tree

Hi Paul,

On Sun, Oct 09 2011, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> I was wondering if you were going to apply this to the mmc tree.  Since
> the module_param addition isn't in the module.h baseline, I'd be
> speculatively fixing an issue that hasn't been created yet, which isn't
> the end of the world, but it doesn't feel quite right to do that either.

Thanks, I've pushed both this patch and "Add module.h to drivers/mmc
users assuming implicit presence" to the mmc-next tree now.

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@...top.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/