lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:13:21 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Pelle Windestam <pelle@...destam.se>
Cc:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers: staging: rts_pstor fixed checkpatch
 warnings

On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 17:14 +0200, Pelle Windestam wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> > This looked nicer in the original version.  I know that checkpatch
> > complains but in the end, checkpatch is just a perl script.  It's
> > less sentient than a squirrel.

I agree.

That's good happy cheery imagery Dan,
but I might have chosen a cockroach too.

> I have to agree with you on that, but I wasn't sure how strictly to
> follow the checkpatch warnings. I'll happily resubmit the patch
> without this change if nobody minds.
 
> -static struct pci_device_id rtsx_ids[] = {
> -	{ 0x10EC, 0x5208, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
> -	{ 0x10EC, 0x5209, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
> -	{ 0x10EC, 0x5288, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
> +static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(rtsx_ids) = {
> +	{ 0x10EC, 0x5208, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
> +	  PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
> +	{ 0x10EC, 0x5209, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
> +	  PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
> +	{ 0x10EC, 0x5288, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
> +	  PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
>  	{ 0, },

Maybe use PCI_DEVICE

static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(rtsx_ids) = {
	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x10EC, 0x5208), PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x10EC, 0x5209), PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x10EC, 0x5288), PCI_CLASS_OTHERS << 16, 0xFF0000 },
	{ 0, },

You could also substitute PCI_VENDOR_ID_REALTEK for 0x10ec


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ