[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111011190534.b3663a8392cc0905b6c4a466@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:05:34 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the hwspinlock tree with the arm-soc
tree
Hi Ohad,
Today's linux-next merge of the hwspinlock tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c between commit 3528c58eb9e8 ("OMAP:
omap_device: when building return platform_device instead of
omap_device") from the arm-soc tree and commit c3c1250e93a7
("hwspinlock/core/omap: fix id issues on multiple hwspinlock devices")
from the hwspinlock tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c
index 0b3ae9d,eb7e509..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c
@@@ -48,13 -53,14 +53,14 @@@ int __init hwspinlocks_init(void
if (oh == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
- pdev = omap_device_build(dev_name, 0, oh, NULL, 0,
- od = omap_device_build(dev_name, 0, oh, &omap_hwspinlock_pdata,
++ pdev = omap_device_build(dev_name, 0, oh, &omap_hwspinlock_pdata,
+ sizeof(struct hwspinlock_pdata),
omap_spinlock_latency,
ARRAY_SIZE(omap_spinlock_latency), false);
- if (IS_ERR(od)) {
+ if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
pr_err("Can't build omap_device for %s:%s\n", dev_name,
oh_name);
- retval = PTR_ERR(od);
+ retval = PTR_ERR(pdev);
}
return retval;
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists