[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1318338617.4060.109.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:10:17 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <ming@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Huang Ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap'd address is
invalid
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 14:03 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Is there any chance of unifying the 32 and 64-bit code here as well?
I was under the impression that this wasn't possible for the cached case
because the 32-bit code path uses ioremap_cache() whereas 64-bit uses
init_memory_mapping() and __va().
Unless I'm missing something?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists