[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <FD2BDBE06AC58549AE9E16C08B45675D05E48085@BBY1EXM10.pmc_nt.nt.pmc-sierra.bc.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:46:55 -0700
From: "Achim Leubner" <Achim_Leubner@...-sierra.com>
To: "Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: "Rolf Eike Beer" <eike-kernel@...tec.de>,
"Adaptec OEM Raid Solutions" <aacraid@...ptec.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [patch] [SCSI] aacraid: use lower snprintf() limit
Agreed.
Thanks,
Achim
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@...cle.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2011 16:31
To: Achim Leubner
Cc: Rolf Eike Beer; Adaptec OEM Raid Solutions; James E.J. Bottomley;
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] [SCSI] aacraid: use lower snprintf() limit
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:19:12AM -0700, Achim Leubner wrote:
> Looks good so far. But do we really need the last two lines?
> > + if (len > 16)
> > + len = 16;
>
snprintf() returns the number of characters that it _would_ have
copied if it had space. We want to return the number of bytes
actually copied.
Again, the snprintf() values do fit so this change doesn't actually
make any difference.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists