[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111011165709.681634347@pistachio.kroah.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:55:19 -0600
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: [09/38] sched: Fix up wchan borkage
3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Simon Kirby <sim@...tway.ca>
commit 6ebbe7a07b3bc40b168d2afc569a6543c020d2e3 upstream.
Commit c259e01a1ec ("sched: Separate the scheduler entry for
preemption") contained a boo-boo wrecking wchan output. It forgot to
put the new schedule() function in the __sched section and thereby
doesn't get properly ignored for things like wchan.
Tested-by: Simon Kirby <sim@...tway.ca>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110923000346.GA25425@hostway.ca
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
kernel/sched.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4335,7 +4335,7 @@ static inline void sched_submit_work(str
blk_schedule_flush_plug(tsk);
}
-asmlinkage void schedule(void)
+asmlinkage void __sched schedule(void)
{
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists