linux-kernel - [34/38] MIPS: PM: Use struct syscore_ops instead of sysdevs for PM (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:55:44 -0600
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: [34/38] MIPS: PM: Use struct syscore_ops instead of sysdevs for PM (v2)

3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>

commit bd7100099a46b59f433dd15ad60adbb4d4f3d625 upstream.

Convert some MIPS architecture's code to using struct syscore_ops
objects for power management instead of sysdev classes and sysdevs.

This simplifies the code and reduces the kernel's memory footprint.
It also is necessary for removing sysdevs from the kernel entirely in
the future.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Acked-and-tested-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J.  Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/2431/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 arch/mips/jz4740/gpio.c |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/mips/jz4740/gpio.c
+++ b/arch/mips/jz4740/gpio.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
-#include <linux/sysdev.h>
+#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/gpio.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
@@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ struct jz_gpio_chip {
 	spinlock_t lock;
 
 	struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
-	struct sys_device sysdev;
 };
 
 static struct jz_gpio_chip jz4740_gpio_chips[];
@@ -459,49 +458,47 @@ static struct jz_gpio_chip jz4740_gpio_c
 	JZ4740_GPIO_CHIP(D),
 };
 
-static inline struct jz_gpio_chip *sysdev_to_chip(struct sys_device *dev)
+static void jz4740_gpio_suspend_chip(struct jz_gpio_chip *chip)
 {
-	return container_of(dev, struct jz_gpio_chip, sysdev);
+	chip->suspend_mask = readl(chip->base + JZ_REG_GPIO_MASK);
+	writel(~(chip->wakeup), chip->base + JZ_REG_GPIO_MASK_SET);
+	writel(chip->wakeup, chip->base + JZ_REG_GPIO_MASK_CLEAR);
 }
 
-static int jz4740_gpio_suspend(struct sys_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
+static int jz4740_gpio_suspend(void)
 {
-	struct jz_gpio_chip *chip = sysdev_to_chip(dev);
+	int i;
 
-	chip->suspend_mask = readl(chip->base + JZ_REG_GPIO_MASK);
-	writel(~(chip->wakeup), chip->base + JZ_REG_GPIO_MASK_SET);
-	writel(chip->wakeup, chip->base + JZ_REG_GPIO_MASK_CLEAR);
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(jz4740_gpio_chips); i++)
+		jz4740_gpio_suspend_chip(&jz4740_gpio_chips[i]);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int jz4740_gpio_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
+static void jz4740_gpio_resume_chip(struct jz_gpio_chip *chip)
 {
-	struct jz_gpio_chip *chip = sysdev_to_chip(dev);
 	uint32_t mask = chip->suspend_mask;
 
 	writel(~mask, chip->base + JZ_REG_GPIO_MASK_CLEAR);
 	writel(mask, chip->base + JZ_REG_GPIO_MASK_SET);
+}
 
-	return 0;
+static void jz4740_gpio_resume(void)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = ARRAY_SIZE(jz4740_gpio_chips) - 1; i >= 0 ; i--)
+		jz4740_gpio_resume_chip(&jz4740_gpio_chips[i]);
 }
 
-static struct sysdev_class jz4740_gpio_sysdev_class = {
-	.name = "gpio",
+static struct syscore_ops jz4740_gpio_syscore_ops = {
 	.suspend = jz4740_gpio_suspend,
 	.resume = jz4740_gpio_resume,
 };
 
-static int jz4740_gpio_chip_init(struct jz_gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int id)
+static void jz4740_gpio_chip_init(struct jz_gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int id)
 {
-	int ret, irq;
-
-	chip->sysdev.id = id;
-	chip->sysdev.cls = &jz4740_gpio_sysdev_class;
-	ret = sysdev_register(&chip->sysdev);
-
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	int irq;
 
 	spin_lock_init(&chip->lock);
 
@@ -519,22 +516,17 @@ static int jz4740_gpio_chip_init(struct
 		irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &jz_gpio_irq_chip,
 					 handle_level_irq);
 	}
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 static int __init jz4740_gpio_init(void)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = sysdev_class_register(&jz4740_gpio_sysdev_class);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(jz4740_gpio_chips); ++i)
 		jz4740_gpio_chip_init(&jz4740_gpio_chips[i], i);
 
+	register_syscore_ops(&jz4740_gpio_syscore_ops);
+
 	printk(KERN_INFO "JZ4740 GPIO initialized\n");
 
 	return 0;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/