[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111011125419.2702b5dc.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:54:19 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Satoru Moriya <smoriya@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"lwoodman@...hat.com" <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
Seiji Aguchi <saguchi@...hat.com>,
"hughd@...gle.com" <hughd@...gle.com>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 -mm] add extra free kbytes tunable
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:32:11 -0400
Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com> wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 06:37 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 20:08:19 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes
> > <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > The page allocator already tries harder if the caller has
> > rt_task(current). Why is this inadequate? Can we extend this idea
> > further to fix whatever-the-problem-is?
>
> Actually page allocator decreases min watermark to 3/4 * min watermark
> for rt-task. But in our case some applications create a lot of
> processes and if all of them are rt-task, the amount of watermark
> bonus(1/4 * min watermark) is not enough.
>
> If we can tune the amount of bonus, it may be fine. But that is
> almost all same as extra free kbytes.
This situation is detectable at runtime. If realtime tasks are being
stalled in the page allocator then start to increase the free-page
reserves. A little control system.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists