linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:15:04 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

Hi all,

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:46:13 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 17:25 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> > 
> > net/rds/ib_rdma.c: In function 'rds_ib_reuse_fmr':
> > net/rds/ib_rdma.c:272:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'llist_del_first' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > net/rds/ib_rdma.c:272:6: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default]
> > net/rds/ib_rdma.c: In function 'rds_ib_flush_mr_pool':
> > net/rds/ib_rdma.c:671:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'llist_add_batch' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > 
> > Caused by commit 1230db8e1543 ("llist: Make some llist functions inline")
> > interacting with commit 1bc144b62524 ("net, rds, Replace xlist in
> > net/rds/xlist.h with llist") from the net tree.  The former commit
> > removes the declarations of llist_del_first() and llist_add_batch() with
> > no explanation (and probably by accident since the definitions still
> > exist).
> 
> Ugh yes, my bad. Ingo objected to inlining all those functions and I
> then screwed up. There are no users of those two functions in my tree.

So can we have that fixed, please?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped