[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E954CDA.10107@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:16:26 +0200
From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
CC: "Kristo, Tero" <t-kristo@...com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 03/18] TEMP: OMAP3xxx: hwmod data: add PRM hwmod
On 10/11/2011 1:26 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
>
>> In fact the device name does not have to match the hwmod name. So we can just
>> create an "omap2_prm" omap_device for OMAP2, "omap3_prm" omap_device for
>> OMAP3...
>> That will allow the relevant PRM driver to be bound to the proper device.
>
> Incidentally, given that we would be using the hwmod name and the version
> number to determine the appropriate omap_device name, what IP version
> numbers should we assign to these PRM IP blocks for different SoCs?
It can just be 1, 2 and 3... The idea is just to differentiate the IP
for each OMAP.
Regards,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists