[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111012094711.GA21090@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:47:12 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@...com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 resend] x86, ioapic: Clean up ioapic idx and apic id
usage
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@...cle.com> wrote:
> Resending x86/ioapic clean up patches.
>
> it will make sure ioapic_idx is used instead of ioapic or apic_idx to used as index.
>
> [PATCH 1/5] x86, ioapic: Passing irq_attr struct pointer with setup_ioapic_irq()
> [PATCH 2/5] x86, ioapic: Split setup_ioapic_entry for interrupt remapped version
> [PATCH 3/5] x86, ioapic: Print out irte with right ioapic index
> [PATCH 4/5] x86, ioapic: Seperate print_IO_APIC() to only print one io apic
> [PATCH 5/5] x86, ioapic: Clean up ioapic/apic_id usage
>
> patch1, 2, 4, 5 are cleanup related
> patch3 fixes the one idx printout.
Applied to tip:x86/apic, thanks!
Another io_apic.c issue that Thomas raised is that we should
standardize arch/x86 on SPARSE_IRQ=y and get rid of all
SPARSE_IRQ=n complications.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists