[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E959A9B.7060100@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:48:11 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@...il.com>
CC: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Increase USBFS Bulk Transfer size
On 10/12/2011 04:36 PM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> We have 2 products which can perform better with increased Bulk transfers
> Device No. 1:
> According to the hardware spec of on of our product
> Available Bulk Transfer Size are:
> - 188 * n bytes, where n = 1 ~ 256.
> Although we can drive that one with 15K as well when setting the HW
> register down to it.
> Device No. 2
> only creates jitter video with Bulk transfer sizes which are below
> 24064 bytes, no such chipfeature is available
> to decrease the bulk transfer size.
> http://sundtek.de/images/dtvjitter2.jpg
> with transfer size of 24064:
> http://sundtek.de/images/gooddata.jpg
> The patch takes the features of Device No. 1 into account allowing a
> maximum buffer of 48128 bytes.
> Those issues have been evaluated with MacOSX and a customized patched
> Linux version.
> Device No. 2 also corrupts on MacOSX with too small packet sizes,
> Windows and Mac are using 24064 bytes.
You are constantly mixing the packet size and the transfer size.
> Default Bulk Transfersize of device No. 1 is around 1-2k which leads
> to very high cpu usage, updating it to 15k lowers that one.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists