lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111012183313.GA22335@hallyn.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:33:13 +0000
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, richard@....at,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, serge.hallyn@...onical.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC] user namespace: make signal.c respect user namespaces
 (v4)

ipc/mqueue.c: for __SI_MESQ, convert the uid being sent to recipient's
user namespace. (new, thanks Oleg)  (XXX - Actually I don't think
rcu_read_lock() is needed there)

__send_signal: convert current's uid to the recipient's user namespace
for any siginfo which is not SI_FROMKERNEL (patch from Oleg, thanks
again :)

do_notify_parent and do_notify_parent_cldstop: map task's uid to parent's
user namespace

ptrace_signal maps parent's uid into current's user namespace before
including in signal to current.  IIUC Oleg has argued that this shouldn't
matter as the debugger will play with it, but it seems like not converting
the value currently being set is misleading.  (Oleg, if you really think
it shouldn't be converted here, I'll drop it;  but I'm afraid it'll lead
people to wondering why it isn't being converted and confusing them)

Changelog:
Sep 20: Inspired by Oleg's suggestion, define map_cred_ns() helper to
	simplify callers and help make clear what we are translating
        (which uid into which namespace).  Passing the target task would
	make callers even easier to read, but we pass in user_ns because
	current_user_ns() != task_cred_xxx(current, user_ns).
Sep 20: As recommended by Oleg, also put task_pid_vnr() under rcu_read_lock
	in ptrace_signal().
Oct 12: Base on Oleg's fixup_uid() patch.  On top of that, handle all
	SI_FROMKERNEL cases at callers, because we can't assume sender is
	current in those cases.

Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
---
 ipc/mqueue.c    |    7 ++++++-
 kernel/signal.c |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ipc/mqueue.c b/ipc/mqueue.c
index ed049ea..bdf57df 100644
--- a/ipc/mqueue.c
+++ b/ipc/mqueue.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
 #include <linux/nsproxy.h>
 #include <linux/pid.h>
 #include <linux/ipc_namespace.h>
+#include <linux/user_namespace.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 
 #include <net/sock.h>
@@ -543,9 +544,13 @@ static void __do_notify(struct mqueue_inode_info *info)
 			sig_i.si_errno = 0;
 			sig_i.si_code = SI_MESGQ;
 			sig_i.si_value = info->notify.sigev_value;
+			/* map current pid/uid into info->owner's namespaces */
+			rcu_read_lock();
 			sig_i.si_pid = task_tgid_nr_ns(current,
 						ns_of_pid(info->notify_owner));
-			sig_i.si_uid = current_uid();
+			sig_i.si_uid = user_ns_map_uid(info->user->user_ns,
+						current_cred(), current_uid());
+			rcu_read_lock();
 
 			kill_pid_info(info->notify.sigev_signo,
 				      &sig_i, info->notify_owner);
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 291c970..025a042 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 #include <linux/freezer.h>
 #include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
 #include <linux/nsproxy.h>
+#include <linux/user_namespace.h>
 #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
 #include <trace/events/signal.h>
 
@@ -1019,6 +1020,29 @@ static inline int legacy_queue(struct sigpending *signals, int sig)
 	return (sig < SIGRTMIN) && sigismember(&signals->signal, sig);
 }
 
+/*
+ * map the uid in struct cred into user namespace *ns
+ */
+static inline uid_t map_cred_ns(const struct cred *cred,
+				struct user_namespace *ns)
+{
+	return user_ns_map_uid(ns, cred, cred->uid);
+}
+
+static inline void fixup_uid(struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_USER_NS
+	if (current_user_ns() == task_cred_xxx(t, user_ns))
+#endif
+		return;
+
+	if (SI_FROMKERNEL(info))
+		return;
+
+	info->si_uid = user_ns_map_uid(task_cred_xxx(t, user_ns),
+					current_cred(), info->si_uid);
+}
+
 static int __send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
 			int group, int from_ancestor_ns)
 {
@@ -1088,6 +1112,9 @@ static int __send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
 				q->info.si_pid = 0;
 			break;
 		}
+
+		fixup_uid(info, t);
+
 	} else if (!is_si_special(info)) {
 		if (sig >= SIGRTMIN && info->si_code != SI_USER) {
 			/*
@@ -1618,7 +1645,8 @@ bool do_notify_parent(struct task_struct *tsk, int sig)
 	 */
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	info.si_pid = task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, tsk->parent->nsproxy->pid_ns);
-	info.si_uid = __task_cred(tsk)->uid;
+	info.si_uid = map_cred_ns(__task_cred(tsk),
+			task_cred_xxx(tsk->parent, user_ns));
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	info.si_utime = cputime_to_clock_t(cputime_add(tsk->utime,
@@ -1703,7 +1731,8 @@ static void do_notify_parent_cldstop(struct task_struct *tsk,
 	 */
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	info.si_pid = task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, parent->nsproxy->pid_ns);
-	info.si_uid = __task_cred(tsk)->uid;
+	info.si_uid = map_cred_ns(__task_cred(tsk),
+			task_cred_xxx(parent, user_ns));
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	info.si_utime = cputime_to_clock_t(tsk->utime);
@@ -2121,8 +2150,11 @@ static int ptrace_signal(int signr, siginfo_t *info,
 		info->si_signo = signr;
 		info->si_errno = 0;
 		info->si_code = SI_USER;
+		rcu_read_lock();
 		info->si_pid = task_pid_vnr(current->parent);
-		info->si_uid = task_uid(current->parent);
+		info->si_uid = map_cred_ns(__task_cred(current->parent),
+				current_user_ns());
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
 
 	/* If the (new) signal is now blocked, requeue it.  */
-- 
1.7.0.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ