[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E95F711.2090004@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:22:41 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Tigran Aivazian <tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>,
Xen Devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86/microcode: support for microcode update in Xen
dom0
On 10/12/2011 12:18 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> If there were a general shift to "this is how we're going to do
> microcode in the future", then Xen will happily go along for the ride.
It *is* how we want to do microcode in the future. There is a prototype
for the Intel hardware side here; we just haven't had time to finalize
it partly because I got pulled onto the kernel.org situation.
> But for right now, this patch seems like the pragmatic solution.
No.
> I think the real question is where there's something objectionable about
> the patch itself?
"It does something that is slightly broken on real hardware and totally
broken for a hypervisor and perpetuates it, while still needing enabling?"
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists