[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E960746.90805@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:31:50 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Tigran Aivazian <tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>,
Xen Devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86/microcode: support for microcode update in Xen
dom0
On 10/12/2011 01:40 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Why is it paramount to do it as early as possible? As in, even doing
> it before Linux kernel is invoked is preferred than during initrd runtime?
It is paramount to do it as early as possible *because the CPU is
broken*. That's why there is a microcode update at all. It is
*supposed* to be installed by BIOS, but for whatever reason it wasn't
(including user doesn't want to update the BIOS), so the very fact that
this is done in the OS at all is a bit of a fail.
Doing it in the bootloader is messy because bootloaders typically aren't
SMP-aware (and really shouldn't need to be), which leaves the OS. On
native hardware it should ideally be done as early in the processor
bringup as possible.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists