[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1318391613-24364-2-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:53:33 +0800
From: ming.lei@...onical.com
To: rjw@...k.pl
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] PM/runtime: handle ->runtime_suspend failure correctly
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
If ->runtime_suspend returns -EAGAIN or -EBUSY, the device should
still be in ACTIVE state, so it is not needed to send idle notification
to its parent; if ->runtime_suspend returns other fatal failure, it
doesn't make sense to send idle notification to its parent.
So skip these when failure is returned from ->runtime_suspend, also
update comments for this handling in rpm_suspend.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
---
drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
index aa23a64..6bb3aaf 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -291,11 +291,11 @@ static int rpm_callback(int (*cb)(struct device *), struct device *dev)
* another suspend has been started earlier, either return immediately
* or wait for it to finish, depending on the RPM_NOWAIT and RPM_ASYNC
* flags. If the RPM_ASYNC flag is set then queue a suspend request;
- * otherwise run the ->runtime_suspend() callback directly. If a deferred
- * resume was requested while the callback was running then carry it out;
- * otherwise send an idle notification for its parent (if the suspend
- * succeeded and both ignore_children of parent->power and irq_safe of
- * dev->power are not set).
+ * otherwise run the ->runtime_suspend() callback directly. When
+ * ->runtime_suspend succeeded, if a deferred resume was requested while
+ * the callback was running then carry it out, otherwise send an idle
+ * notification for its parent (if the suspend succeeded and both
+ * ignore_children of parent->power and irq_safe of dev->power are not set).
*
* This function must be called under dev->power.lock with interrupts disabled.
*/
@@ -420,15 +420,16 @@ static int rpm_suspend(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
dev->power.runtime_error = 0;
else
pm_runtime_cancel_pending(dev);
- } else {
+ wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
+ goto out;
+ }
no_callback:
- __update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_SUSPENDED);
- pm_runtime_deactivate_timer(dev);
+ __update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_SUSPENDED);
+ pm_runtime_deactivate_timer(dev);
- if (dev->parent) {
- parent = dev->parent;
- atomic_add_unless(&parent->power.child_count, -1, 0);
- }
+ if (dev->parent) {
+ parent = dev->parent;
+ atomic_add_unless(&parent->power.child_count, -1, 0);
}
wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists