linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:29:16 +0900
From:	Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@....lapis-semi.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi, Stephen

(2011/10/12 13:24), Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> Just try building gpio-pch and gpio-ml-ioh as modules ...
> irq_setup_generic_chip() does not have an EXPORT_SYMBOL (and didn't in
> v3.0 either).
> 

Your report looks like the same as ours.
In our develop environment,
build becomes success only gpio-pch/gpio-ml-ioh is integrated as built-in.
In case of integrated as modules, build becomes failure.

I understood this behavior is specification/limitation of GPIO interrupt
function.
Is it true ?

-- 
tomoya
ROHM Co., Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/