linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1318400368.1546.372.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Date:	Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:49:28 +0530
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
Cc:	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	DL-SHA-WorkGroupLinux <workgroup.linux@....com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api

On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 13:41 +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> 2011/10/11 Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>:
> > On 10 October 2011 21:32, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 16:46 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> >>> On 10 October 2011 16:15, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > But I am fine if we find a common ground and merge the two where dmac
> >>> > can cleanly identify direction and mode it is operating.
> >>> >
> >>> The client would set the xfer_direction and dmac would interpret as
> >>>
> >>> enum xfer_direction {
> >>>      MEM_TO_MEM,   ->  Async/Memcpy mode
> >>>      MEM_TO_DEV,    ->  Slave mode & From Memory to Device
> >>>      DEV_TO_MEM,    ->  Slave mode & From Device to Memory
> >>>      DEV_TO_DEV,     ->  Slave mode & From Device to Device
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> How could it get any cleaner?
> >> Consider the case of a dmac driver which supports interleaved dma as
> >> well as memcpy and slave
> >> It needs to interpret dma_data_direction for later cases and
> >> xfer_direction for former ones.
> > dma_data_direction is the mapping attribute of a buffer and is not meant to
> > tell type of source and destination of a transfer.
> > xfer_direction is meant for that purpose.
> > So I'd rather convert device_prep_dma_cyclic and device_prep_slave_sg
> > to use xfer_direction.
> 
> i tend to agree with Jassi. now dma_data_direction actually is only
> mapping things not real transfer direction.
> xfer_direction is now something really telling the data transfer direction.
> I think that's what device_prep_dma_cyclic and device_prep_slave_sg want.
> 
> actually, there is only one case we need to use dma_data_direction in
> dmac driver, that's unmapping async dma buffer.
> But the param to dma_unmap_single can be implied by xfer_direction and
> dma description.
> 
> that's why i think we should rename dma_data_direction to
> dma_map_direction or something like that to avoid confusion.
Nope, I would leave dma_data_direction as is.
We should use above enum in dmaengine and all dmac drivers.

@Jassi: I have started doing this change for dmaengine and dmacs, and I
took the liberty to name this enum as dma_transfer_direction, hope you
are okay with that


-- 
~Vinod

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/