[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyMXgzywjXCtS1a5F-BDu_XP4ecg3Tw7zLuawZs0QNYaw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:19:16 +1200
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] fixing the UML failure root cause
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu> wrote:
>
> So here's a different approach. It's not perfect: it always blames
> SEGV_MAPERR instead of SEGV_ACCERR. I implemented it for vgettimeofday
> but not the other two vsyscalls.
>
> What do you think of this approach? If it seems good, I'll finish the
> patch and submit it.
I think the approach is valid, but you should *not* do this as some
kind of crazy byte-by-byte copy_to_user() emulation.
Do the "copy tz to user mode" as individual "put_user()" calls for
tv_sec/tv_usec/timezone. IOW, there are three words being written to
user mode, not "two memcpy's".
Other than that, there doesn't seem to be anything wrong.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists