linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 6/9] ASoC: da7210: bugfix for head phone volume control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1318497153.12107.439.camel@matrix>
Date:	Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:42:33 +0530
From:	Ashish Chavan <ashish.chavan@...tcummins.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	<lrg@...com>, alsa-devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
	<kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 6/9] ASoC: da7210: bugfix for head phone
 volume control

On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 16:01 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 08:35:34PM +0530, Ashish Chavan wrote:
> > This patch takes care of reserved bits of headphone volume
> > register by using correct volume range.
> 
> This doesn't apply, which is pretty surprising given that there's no
> obvious overlap at all with the rest of the code.

I guess this is mostly due to indirect dependence on [PATCH 1/9].
It applies after applying first patch.

> 
> > Tested on Samsung SMDK6410 board with DA7210 evaluation board.
> 
> This really isn't useful information in a changelog, apart from anything
> else this isn't going to be a system that it's easy for other people to
> reproduce.
> 
OK, will remove redundant info.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/