[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32454.1318519287@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:21:27 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Mark Moseley <moseleymark@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com,
Linux filesystem caching discussion list
<linux-cachefs@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-cachefs] 3.0.3 64-bit Crash running fscache/cachefilesd
Mark Moseley <moseleymark@...il.com> wrote:
> So on a cleared cache with SLAB, it took a while but this finally came
> up. One interesting thing is that at some point, it logged this:
>
> [13461.605871] [httpd ] <== __fscache_read_or_alloc_pages() = -ENOBUFS
> [invalidating]
That's okay. Basically, a read-from-cache operation was rejected because the
cache object was in the early phase of being invalidated. I kept it simple
here - the read might complete next time it is tried, but it's just a cache so
that shouldn't matter.
> It was a while from when it logged that until when I happened to check
> on the box again, but when I did (shortly before this traceback),
> despite constant NFS activity, nothing in the fscache cache was
> getting written out (i.e. the used bytes on the partition stopped
> changing), and without any messages about withdrawing the cache or
> anythin.
Did you look at /proc/fs/fscache/stats at all?
> [20839.802118] kernel BUG at fs/fscache/object-list.c:83!
> [20839.802733] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
That fits with the previous BUG elsewhere in object-list.c. It sounds like
there's a refcounting problem somewhere.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists