[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E970B40.8070808@genband.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:01:04 -0600
From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
To: Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@...il.com>
CC: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Increase USBFS Bulk Transfer size
On 10/13/2011 09:19 AM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Alan Stern<stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> This is very interesting. There are only two things that could be
>> happening: Either the device sends different data during the two tests,
>> or there's a bug in the kernel.
> Before that I insist that this patch will go into the kernel (I know
> that sounds ridiculous but so far I did everything
> you requested me to do), I clearly pointed out that we even have hardware
> specs which can influence the transfer buffer. The patch does not hurt
> and makes the device work.
That makes no sense. If there's a bug in the hardware we likely don't
want to make global changes to work around it--a more targeted fix may
be more appropriate.
If there is a bug in the kernel, why would we want a bandaid patch that
just happens to make it work rather than a true fix?
Chris
--
Chris Friesen
Software Developer
GENBAND
chris.friesen@...band.com
www.genband.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists