[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111013164406.GA17444@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:44:06 -0500
From: Mike Miller <mike.miller@...com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: thenzl@...hat.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
scameron@...rdog.cce.hp.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] hpsa: change confusing comment to more clear
Patch 1 of 1
hpsa: clarify comment in kdump reset code
From: Mike Miller <mike.miller@...com>
The following warning message may be confusing to some users:
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Controller claims that "
"'Bit 2 doorbell reset' is "
"supported, but not 'bit 5 doorbell reset'. "
"Firmware update is recommended.\n");
Most users don't know or care what bit we may be hitting. Also change
"recommended" to "required."
Signed-off-by: Mike Miller <mike.miller@...com>
---
drivers/scsi/hpsa.c | 6 ++----
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
index 311bf7a..f7a569e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
@@ -3450,10 +3450,8 @@ static __devinit int hpsa_kdump_hard_reset_controller(struct pci_dev *pdev)
} else {
use_doorbell = misc_fw_support & MISC_FW_DOORBELL_RESET;
if (use_doorbell) {
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Controller claims that "
- "'Bit 2 doorbell reset' is "
- "supported, but not 'bit 5 doorbell reset'. "
- "Firmware update is recommended.\n");
+ dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Soft reset not supported. "
+ "Firmware update is required.\n");
rc = -ENOTSUPP; /* try soft reset */
goto unmap_cfgtable;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists