[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111013180714.GA7422@linux-mips.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:07:14 +0100
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Cc: manesoni@...co.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, ananth@...ibm.com, kamensky@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS Kprobes: Support branch instructions probing
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:28:51AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> Where is the handling for:
>
> case cop1_op:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON
> case lwc2_op: /* This is bbit0 on Octeon */
> case ldc2_op: /* This is bbit032 on Octeon */
> case swc2_op: /* This is bbit1 on Octeon */
> case sdc2_op: /* This is bbit132 on Octeon */
> #endif
>
> These are all defined in insn_has_delayslot() but not here.
Which is a wonderful demonstration for why duplicating such a large
function from branch.c was a baaad thing to do.
Maneesh, can you refactor the code to share everything that was copied
from __compute_return_epc() can be shared with kprobes? Idealy make
everything a two part series, first one patch to refactor branch.c and
the 2nd patch to deal with kprobes.
Thanks,
Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists