[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111013135032.7c2c54cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:50:32 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reduce vm_stat cacheline contention in
__vm_enough_memory
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:54:30 -0500 (CDT)
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
>
> > > increase the allowed delta per zone if frequent updates occur via the
> > > overflow checks in vmstat.c. See calculate_*_threshold there.
> >
> > I tried changing the threshold in both directions, with slower throughput in
> > both cases.
>
> If that is the case check for the vm_stat cacheline being shared with
> another hot kernel variable variable. Maybe that causes cacheline
> eviction.
yup. `nm -n vmlinux'.
> If there are no updates occurring for a while (due to increased deltas
> and/or vmstat updates) then the vm_stat cacheline should be able to stay
> in shared mode in multiple processors and the performance should increase.
>
We could cacheline align vm_stat[]. But the thing is pretty small - we
couild put each entry in its own cacheline.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists